"Buying In": A lot of times Ben Shapiro will get us to "Buy In" to an argument he's made that may be embellished or exaggerated.They can acknowledge them as true, but they don't give them the weight that those of a democratic disposition do to influence policy and others actions. People who ascribe to Ben Shapiro's viewpoint don't take emotions as evidence. Feelings & Emotions Don't Matter: They matter, but just not really.Over time, and with the help of other boxing coaches, I've come to a few punch combinations he will use with frequency: I learn my opponent, like the back of my hand, and take in his fighting style. I take in his punch combinations, and trust that they won't be too different from others I am boxing in the world around me. I pull out my own facts and evidence to support my viewpoints and trust that I feel I would have check-mated Shapiro there. I listen to the points Ben makes, and I counter them with my own logic as to why his viewpoint is short-sighted. I ride in my car with an episode of "The Ben Shapiro Show" pulled up on my Apple Podcast, and I brace myself for harsh remarks and supremacist quips that will probably piss me off. For the past year or so, I've taken this principle and applied it to a different form of combat: Verbal Shadow-Boxing. I do it at the Y in Uptown Charlotte and everybody looks at me like a moron, but it's a great workout. It's a great way to get your endurance up, develop combinations and attacks, and fall into the rhythm of a match before actually sparring an opponent. I have an app on my phone, "Shadowboxing", that gives you punch combinations and a running clock to simulate a match with an opponent. Shadow Boxing is defined by Oxford as "sparring with an imaginary opponent as a form of training." In common person's terms in Chicago, it means you gotta get some friends. He is a voice that won't be able to be shuffled to the side by the left as alt-right nonsense, and can't be considered far removed from average Americans thinking. He has personal phone access to The President, Key Policy Makers, and Influencers across the Conservative Spectrum (Old & New). His podcast, "The Ben Shapiro Show", is consistently one of the most-watched shows on the Apple Podcast market. He has 2 M followers on Instagram and 3 M followers on Twitter. I'll follow that by saying that to ignore his ability to resonate with people and garner a base is equally narcissistic and hypocritical. I think he's discounts real-world perspectives in the interest of spinning data points to support his narrative, and makes complex issues too plain. I think his approach to making his viewpoint known turns away any hopes of middle-minded Americans feeling he represents them. I think he's narcissistic, hypocritical, and unkind. I'll start off by saying I don't like Ben Shapiro. It's more parts anticipation than power, its more parts dance than blood feud. You must anticipate your opponents punch combos, understand the way they move about the ring, understand their mental space. However, in my opinion, boxing is closer to modern sword fighting than it is a neanderthal cave fight. Not every regulation is a good regulation, and for certain sectors of society and industry, there are probably too many regulations and some of them just seem absurd.I feel like a lot of people view boxing as this brutish, aggression based sport where the fighters are just lofting punches at each other's faces, which it is. However, I will concede some ground to conservatives. Capitalist industry almost never self-regulates because for many sectors there is no incentive (as evident by the long history of industry failing to self regulate to fix problems), therefore government regulation is almost always needed (who else is going to do it?). Capitalism is great, I am 100% on board, but it is a double edged sword it both creates and destroys. After regulations, they go a way or becomes less threatening. Before regulations, the problems persist in varying degrees of severity. This is what always annoys me about this conversation we always have a history before and after regulation. The EPA has been one of the greatest government successes. Since its creation in 1970, EPA regulations cleaned up a lot of the mess caused by unfettered industry. The market was unrestrained and completely failed at preventing environmental pollution and disasters. In the 50s, smog was so bad in parts of California that you couldn't see more than a few blocks. Before the EPA, a river caught fire in Ohio and oil leakages from offshore rigs polluted the shores. And this does not just apply to building codes. Many of the building codes were the result of people building unsafe structures that caused engineering or structural failure. And this is the point that conservatives always seems to miss when it come to regulations. Rogan's position on regulations is surprisingly solid.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |